The Listener, 22 March, 1945. Vol. XXXIII. No. 845 (p. 324) [.pdf]
Poetry in War Time
I have nothing to add to this discussion except a few words of protest at the attempts of Mr. Richards and Mr. Bliss to credit other people with as great a talent in the non sequitur as their own. I did not suggest that good poets had lacked appreciation in the past (nor do they now). What I did suggest was that there has always been a vociferous sub-current of criticism which hates the contemporary; and that that tradition is maintained by Mr. Richards, Major Hunter and Mr. Bliss. And I should be the last to suggest that such -voices infiuence public appraisal very much, even in their own time. But if they ask questions, one must attempt to answer them, even if they will notdare I quote?'stay for an answer'.
BletchleyHenry Reed
The passion for obscurity, which prevents so much modern verse from being poetry, is a perennial problem, and the criticism of it current today may be matched from the distant past. In 1646, François Maynard, a French poet, published an epigram addressed to a contemporary writer, which may be Englished as follows:The sense of what you writeCould a wiser admonition be addressed to the authors of some of the verse we are expected to understand in Horizon, New Writing, etc.?
Lies locked behind close bars:
Your language is a night
Lacking the moon and stars.
My friend, your garden weed
Of this dark mystic strain:
Your works at present need
A god to make them plain.
If you wish to conceal
The beauties of your mind,
How odd you do not feel
Silence to be more kind!
LiverpoolAllan M. Laing